top of page

Essential4Health

Get Healthy ~ Stay Healthy

Essential4Health

Get Healthy ~ Stay Healthy

lab-scientists-blood-urine-test-analysis

Esophageal Manometry

patient-consulting-doctor

EM

Description

"Esophageal Manometry" test evaluates how well the muscles in your esophagus and lower esophageal sphincter are functioning. A thin tube with pressure sensors is gently inserted through the nose to record muscle activity during swallowing. This test is often used to diagnose conditions like achalasia, esophageal spasms, or chronic GERD. If you experience swallowing difficulties or unexplained chest pain, manometry can provide valuable insights. Results guide treatment options like medication, diet adjustments, or surgical intervention for improved digestive function.

"Esophageal Manometry" test evaluates how well the muscles in your esophagus and lower esophageal sphincter are functioning. A thin tube with pressure sensors is gently inserted through the nose to record muscle activity during swallowing. This test is often used to diagnose conditions like achalasia, esophageal spasms, or chronic GERD. If you experience swallowing difficulties or unexplained chest pain, manometry can provide valuable insights. Results guide treatment options like medication, diet adjustments, or surgical intervention for improved digestive function.

Test Category

GI Tract Function

Procedure

Invasive

Sample Type

No biological sample is needed for this test.

Units

Not Applicable

Procedure Category

Insert, Measure

Test Group

Endoscopic Procedure Group

Test Group Description

Endoscopic Procedure Group: This group encompasses a range of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures performed using an endoscope, a flexible tube with a camera and light at its tip. These procedures allow healthcare providers to visualize internal organs and tissues, such as the gastrointestinal tract, respiratory system, and urinary tract.

Optimal Range

For All Individuals:

  • Result: Negative: No abnormalities detected.

Normal Range

For All Individuals:

  • Result: Negative: No abnormalities detected.

Results That Differ From The Norm (Direct and Indirect Causes)

Abnormal results may indicate:


  • Abnormal deglutitive lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (Inappropriate relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter during swallowing)

  • Achalasia (Failure of the lower esophageal sphincter to relax during swallowing, leading to difficulty in passing food into the stomach)

  • Diffuse esophageal spasm (Uncoordinated contractions of the esophageal muscles)

  • Esophageal spasms ...

Key Reasons For Testing

  • Esophageal Function Assessment: Esophageal manometry evaluates the motility and pressure of the esophagus during swallowing.

  • Diagnosis of Motility Disorders: Identifies conditions like achalasia, esophageal spasm, and ineffective motility by analyzing muscle function and coordination.

  • Lower Esophageal Sphincter Function: Assesses LES pressure and relaxation, aiding in GERD and hiatal hernia diagnosis.

  • Evaluation of...

Health Status Conditions It May Be Used To Assess

Currently, this test is not directly associated with any conditions listed on the Health Status page. However, it may be included as part of a broader set of tests linked to specific health conditions.

Some Prominent Medical Labs That May Offer This Test

Please note that this particular test has not been associated with any of the listed prominent medical labs. We recommend enquiring with your private physician or nearest hospital to determine where this specific test can be performed.

References

Important Note

Any medical procedure yielding results outside the norm may be directly or indirectly linked to the conditions outlined on this page. Various factors, including genetics, medication and supplement usage, recent illnesses, pregnancy, pre-test eating, smoking, and stress, can impact the test's outcome. Additionally, factors like false positives, false negatives, inaccurate analyses, and others can influence results.


Reference ranges, which help healthcare professionals interpret medical tests, may vary depending on age, gender, and other factors. They may also differ between laboratories due to variations in instruments and methods used. Optimal ranges are designed for preventive purposes, aiming to identify trends and potential risks early, while normal ranges reflect conventional laboratory values indicating no current disease or pathology. Your healthcare practitioner may have specific reasons for testing that deviate from the usual or may interpret results differently based on individual circumstances. Proper interpretation typically involves considering clinical findings and other diagnostic tests. Hence, it is crucial to provide your healthcare professionals with a comprehensive medical history, consult with them for result interpretation, and follow their guidance for potential re-testing or additional diagnostics.

Disclaimer

This content is provided solely for informative and educational purposes. It is not intended as a substitute for medical advice or treatment from a personal physician. Regarding the interpretation of their medical test results and/or specific health questions, it is recommended that all readers and viewers consult their physicians or other qualified health professionals. The publisher is not responsible for any adverse health effects that may result from reading or following the information in this educational content. Before beginning any nutrition, supplement, or lifestyle program, all viewers, especially those taking prescription or over-the-counter medications, should consult their physician or health care practitioner.


Please note that while prominent lab names are included in this content, we cannot guarantee that these labs offer all the tests mentioned. For confirmation, individuals should contact the labs directly or consult their medical practitioners. The information provided reflects general knowledge at the time of publication and may not include recent updates or emerging research. Readers should verify details with qualified professionals to ensure the most up-to-date and accurate guidance.

[1] Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ. AGA technical review on the clinical use of esophageal manometry. Gastroenterology.2005;128(1):209-224.
[2] Clouse RE, Staiano A, Alrakawi A, Haroian L. Application of topographical methods to clinical esophageal manometry. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95(10):2720-2730.
[3] Roman S, Huot L, Zerbib F, et al. High-resolution manometry: A new gold standard to diagnose esophageal motility disorders? Gastroenterology. 2010;138(7):2211-2212.
[4] Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, et al. The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27(2):160-174.
[5] Carlson DA, Ravi K, Kahrilas PJ, et al. Diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders: Esophageal pressure topography vs. conventional line tracing. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110(7):967-977.
[6] Roman S, Kahrilas PJ. Challenges in the management of achalasia and esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Gastroenterology. 2019;156(4):873-886.
[7] Gyawali CP, Bredenoord AJ, Conklin JL, et al. Evaluation of esophageal motor function in clinical practice. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;25(2):99-133.
[8] Savarino E, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, et al. Expert consensus document: Advances in the physiological assessment and diagnosis of GERD. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;14(11):665-676.
[9] Yadlapati R, Pandolfino JE, Fox MR, et al. Management of esophageal motility disorders in the era of high-resolution manometry: A clinical practice update. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112(11):1692-1700.
[10] Fox M, Bredenoord AJ. High-resolution manometry: Moving from research into clinical practice. Gut.2008;57(3):405-423.
[11] Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE, Zhang Q, et al. Quantifying esophageal peristalsis with high-resolution manometry: A study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2006;290(5).
[12] Jain A, Baker JR, Chen JW. Esophageal motility disorders: Role of high-resolution manometry. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2018;14(2):92-102.
[13] Kahrilas PJ, Kim HC, Pandolfino JE. Approaches to the diagnosis and grading of hiatal hernia. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;22(4):601-616.
[14] Rengarajan A, Gyawali CP. High-resolution manometry in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2014;43(1):89-105.

If You Found This Test Helpful, You Might Also Like..

bottom of page