Food Diary
FD
Description
"Food Diary" is a structured tool used to track what you eat, when you eat, and how food affects your body. Doctors often recommend it to uncover patterns tied to digestive issues, allergies, or nutrient gaps. Logging meals and symptoms helps reveal triggers or imbalances in your diet. This tool supports better choices around food and health. Regular use of a food diary can guide personalized nutrition strategies and improve long-term dietary awareness.
Category
Nutrition
Procedure
Non-Invasive
Sample Type
No biological sample is needed for this test.
Units
Not Applicable
Procedure Category
Assess
Test Group
Nutritional Assessment Group
Test Group Description
Nutritional Assessment Group: Tests within this group analyze various aspects of an individual's nutritional status and dietary intake. These assessments provide insights into macronutrient and micronutrient levels, nutritional deficiencies, and dietary patterns.
Optimal Range
For All Individuals:
Result: Negative: No abnormalities detected.
Normal Range
For All Individuals:
Result: Negative: No abnormalities detected.
Results That Differ From The Norm (Direct and Indirect Causes)
Abnormal results may indicate:
Anorexia nervosa (Eating disorder characterized by restricted food intake)
Binge eating disorder (Eating disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of overeating)
Bulimia nervosa (Eating disorder characterized by binge eating followed by purging)
Chronic headaches
Diabetes management (Monitoring and controlling blood sugar levels)
...
Key Reasons For Testing
Nutritional Assessment: Tracks dietary intake, evaluating macro- and micronutrient adequacy and overall diet quality.
Eating Patterns: Identifies meal timing, portion sizes, and choices influencing energy balance and habits.
Behavior Awareness: Reveals emotional eating, mindless snacking, or external triggers for better regulation.
Caloric Tracking: Helps monitor energy intake for weight management and portion control.
Dietary Goals: Evaluates progress in meeting nutritional targets.
Food Sensitivities: Correlates symptoms with foods to identify allergies or intolerances.
Health Status Conditions It May Be Used To Assess
Currently, this test is not directly associated with any conditions listed on the Health Status page. However, it may be included as part of a broader set of tests linked to specific health conditions.
Some Prominent Medical Labs That May Offer This Test
Please note that this particular test has not been associated with any of the listed prominent medical labs. We recommend enquiring with your private physician or nearest hospital to determine where this specific test can be performed.
References
Important Note
Any medical procedure yielding results outside the norm may be directly or indirectly linked to the conditions outlined on this page. Various factors, including genetics, medication and supplement usage, recent illnesses, pregnancy, pre-test eating, smoking, and stress, can impact the test's outcome. Additionally, factors like false positives, false negatives, inaccurate analyses, and others can influence results.
Reference ranges, which help healthcare professionals interpret medical tests, may vary depending on age, gender, and other factors. They may also differ between laboratories due to variations in instruments and methods used. Optimal ranges are designed for preventive purposes, aiming to identify trends and potential risks early, while normal ranges reflect conventional laboratory values indicating no current disease or pathology. Your healthcare practitioner may have specific reasons for testing that deviate from the usual or may interpret results differently based on individual circumstances. Proper interpretation typically involves considering clinical findings and other diagnostic tests. Hence, it is crucial to provide your healthcare professionals with a comprehensive medical history, consult with them for result interpretation, and follow their guidance for potential re-testing or additional diagnostics.
Disclaimer
This content is provided solely for informative and educational purposes. It is not intended as a substitute for medical advice or treatment from a personal physician. Regarding the interpretation of their medical test results and/or specific health questions, it is recommended that all readers and viewers consult their physicians or other qualified health professionals. The publisher is not responsible for any adverse health effects that may result from reading or following the information in this educational content. Before beginning any nutrition, supplement, or lifestyle program, all viewers, especially those taking prescription or over-the-counter medications, should consult their physician or health care practitioner.
Please note that while prominent lab names are included in this content, we cannot guarantee that these labs offer all the tests mentioned. For confirmation, individuals should contact the labs directly or consult their medical practitioners. The information provided reflects general knowledge at the time of publication and may not include recent updates or emerging research. Readers should verify details with qualified professionals to ensure the most up-to-date and accurate guidance.
[1] Thompson FE, Byers T. Dietary assessment resource manual. J Nutr. 1994;124(11 Suppl):2245S-2317S.
[2] Willett WC, Lenart E. Reproducibility and validity of food-frequency questionnaires. In: Willett WC, ed. Nutritional Epidemiology. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2013:96-141.
[3] Cade J, Thompson R, Burley V, Warm D. Development, validation and utilisation of food-frequency questionnaires—a review. Public Health Nutr. 2002;5(4):567-587.
[4] Conway JM, Ingwersen LA, Vinyard BT, Moshfegh AJ. Effectiveness of the USDA 5-step multiple-pass method in assessing food intake in obese and nonobese women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77(5):1171-1178.
[5] Subar AF, Freedman LS, Tooze JA, et al. Addressing current criticism regarding the value of self-report dietary data. J Nutr. 2015;145(12):2639-2645.
[6] Freedman LS, Midthune D, Carroll RJ, et al. Adjustments to improve the estimation of usual dietary intake distributions in the population. J Nutr. 2004;134(7):1836-1843.
[7] Shim JS, Oh K, Kim HC. Dietary assessment methods in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiol Health. 2014;36.
[8] Kipnis V, Midthune D, Freedman LS, et al. Bias in dietary-report instruments and its implications for nutritional epidemiology. Public Health Nutr. 2002;5(6A):915-923.
[9] Johnson RK. Dietary intake—how do we measure what people are really eating? Obes Res. 2002;10 Suppl 1:63S-68S.
[10] Schatzkin A, Subar AF, Thompson FE, et al. Design and serendipity in establishing a large cohort with wide dietary intake distributions: the NIH-American Association of Retired Persons Diet and Health Study. Am J Epidemiol.2001;154(12):1119-1125.
[11] Subar AF, Kirkpatrick SI, Mittl B, et al. The Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recall (ASA24): a resource for researchers, clinicians, and educators from the National Cancer Institute. J Acad Nutr Diet.2012;112(8):1134-1137.
[12] Trabulsi J, Schoeller DA. Evaluation of dietary assessment instruments against doubly labeled water, a biomarker of habitual energy intake. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2001;281(5).