top of page

Essential4Health

Get Healthy ~ Stay Healthy

Essential4Health

Get Healthy ~ Stay Healthy

lab-scientists-blood-urine-test-analysis

Hysterosonography

female-visiting-doctor-doing-ultrasound-scan

HSN

Description

"Hysterosonography" (Saline Infusion Sonography) uses a small amount of sterile saline to expand the uterus for clearer ultrasound imaging. Doctors recommend this test when evaluating fibroids, polyps, scarring, or unexplained fertility issues. The saline improves visibility of the uterine lining during transvaginal ultrasound. It’s done in an outpatient setting and requires no sedation. Results inform next steps like surgery, fertility treatment, or further imaging. Hysterosonography is a valuable tool for investigating abnormal bleeding or uterine abnormalities.

"Hysterosonography" (Saline Infusion Sonography) uses a small amount of sterile saline to expand the uterus for clearer ultrasound imaging. Doctors recommend this test when evaluating fibroids, polyps, scarring, or unexplained fertility issues. The saline improves visibility of the uterine lining during transvaginal ultrasound. It’s done in an outpatient setting and requires no sedation. Results inform next steps like surgery, fertility treatment, or further imaging. Hysterosonography is a valuable tool for investigating abnormal bleeding or uterine abnormalities.

Test Category

Reproductive Function

Procedure

Invasive

Sample Type

No biological sample is needed for this test.

Units

Not Applicable

Procedure Category

Scan

Test Group

Reproductive Health Group

Test Group Description

Reproductive Health Group: Tests within this group are dedicated to evaluating various aspects of reproductive health in both men and women. These assessments provide insights into reproductive hormone levels, menstrual cycles, fertility, and reproductive organ health.

Optimal Range

For All Individuals:

  • Result: Negative: No abnormalities detected.

Normal Range

For All Individuals:

  • Result: Negative: No abnormalities detected.

Results That Differ From The Norm (Direct and Indirect Causes)

Abnormal results may indicate:


  • Arcuate uterus (Mild uterine anomaly characterized by a slight indentation at the top of the uterus)

  • Bicornuate uterus (Uterine anomaly where the uterus has two separate cavities)

  • Didelphic uterus (Uterine anomaly where there are two separate uterine horns and cervixes)

  • Endometrial hyperplasia (Abnormal thickening of the uterine lining)

  • E...

Key Reasons For Testing

  • Evaluation of Uterine Abnormalities: Hysterosonography provides detailed imaging to diagnose fibroids, polyps, adhesions, or congenital anomalies.

  • Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: Assesses the endometrium to identify causes and guide treatment.

  • Infertility Assessment: Evaluates uterine factors impacting fertility and aids in interventions.

  • Detection of Pathologies: Offers higher sensitivity than transvaginal ult...

Health Status Conditions It May Be Used To Assess

Currently, this test is not directly associated with any conditions listed on the Health Status page. However, it may be included as part of a broader set of tests linked to specific health conditions.

Some Prominent Medical Labs That May Offer This Test

Please note that this particular test has not been associated with any of the listed prominent medical labs. We recommend enquiring with your private physician or nearest hospital to determine where this specific test can be performed.

References

Important Note

Any medical procedure yielding results outside the norm may be directly or indirectly linked to the conditions outlined on this page. Various factors, including genetics, medication and supplement usage, recent illnesses, pregnancy, pre-test eating, smoking, and stress, can impact the test's outcome. Additionally, factors like false positives, false negatives, inaccurate analyses, and others can influence results.


Reference ranges, which help healthcare professionals interpret medical tests, may vary depending on age, gender, and other factors. They may also differ between laboratories due to variations in instruments and methods used. Optimal ranges are designed for preventive purposes, aiming to identify trends and potential risks early, while normal ranges reflect conventional laboratory values indicating no current disease or pathology. Your healthcare practitioner may have specific reasons for testing that deviate from the usual or may interpret results differently based on individual circumstances. Proper interpretation typically involves considering clinical findings and other diagnostic tests. Hence, it is crucial to provide your healthcare professionals with a comprehensive medical history, consult with them for result interpretation, and follow their guidance for potential re-testing or additional diagnostics.

Disclaimer

This content is provided solely for informative and educational purposes. It is not intended as a substitute for medical advice or treatment from a personal physician. Regarding the interpretation of their medical test results and/or specific health questions, it is recommended that all readers and viewers consult their physicians or other qualified health professionals. The publisher is not responsible for any adverse health effects that may result from reading or following the information in this educational content. Before beginning any nutrition, supplement, or lifestyle program, all viewers, especially those taking prescription or over-the-counter medications, should consult their physician or health care practitioner.


Please note that while prominent lab names are included in this content, we cannot guarantee that these labs offer all the tests mentioned. For confirmation, individuals should contact the labs directly or consult their medical practitioners. The information provided reflects general knowledge at the time of publication and may not include recent updates or emerging research. Readers should verify details with qualified professionals to ensure the most up-to-date and accurate guidance.

[1] Lopes VM, Barguil JP, Lacerda TS, et al. An overview of the results of hysterosonography prior to in vitro fertilization. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2017;21(4):302-305.
[2] Di Spiezio Sardo A, Calagna G, Scognamiglio M, et al. The role of hysterosonography in the diagnosis of intrauterine pathologies: a review of the literature. Minerva Ginecol. 2016;68(2):141-150.
[3] Alcázar JL, Galván R, Albela S, et al. Transvaginal sonography combined with hysterosonography and hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of endometrial disease in postmenopausal women. J Ultrasound Med. 2001;20(3):295-299.
[4] Van den Bosch T, Dueholm M, Leone FP, et al. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(3):284-298.
[5] Grimbizis GF, Campo R, Congilosi A, et al. Hysteroscopic resection of submucous fibroids and endometrial polyps: A prospective comparative study on hysterosonographic and hysteroscopic evaluation. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(12):2462-2467.
[6] Emanuel MH, Verdel MJ, Wamsteker K, Lammes FB. A prospective comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and diagnostic hysteroscopy in the evaluation of patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172(2 Pt 1):547-552.
[7] Brown DL, Doubilet PM, Miller FH, Frates MC. Benign and malignant endometrial conditions: Differentiation with endovaginal sonography. Radiology. 1993;186(3):717-720.
[8] Dubinsky TJ, Parvey HR, Maklad N. The role of transvaginal sonography and hysterosonography in evaluating endometrial abnormalities. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169(1):163-166.
[9] Sallam HN, Farrag AF, Agameya AF, Rahman AF, Shady M. Does hysterosonography contribute to in vitro fertilization outcome in patients with recurrent IVF-ET failure? Gynecol Endocrinol. 2008;24(7):383-387.
[10] Timor-Tritsch IE, Goldstein SR. Ultrasound screening of the postmenopausal endometrium. Clin Obstet Gynecol.2012;55(1):213-226.
[11] Reinhold C, Atri M, Bret PM, Mehio A, Zakarian R, Aldis AE. Endometrial polyps: evaluation with transvaginal sonography, hysterosonography, and histopathologic correlation. Radiology. 1995;197(2):607-612.
[12] Epstein E, Ramirez A, Skoog L, Valentin L. Transvaginal sonography, sonohysterography, and histologic examination in the evaluation of endometrial polyps in women with postmenopausal bleeding. Obstet Gynecol.2001;97(3):403-408.
[13] Ragni G, Bracco GL, Benaglia L, et al. Endometrial polyps: Diagnostic accuracy of hysterosonography. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(12):3493-3498.

If You Found This Test Helpful, You Might Also Like..

bottom of page