top of page

Essential4Health

Evidence-based natural health

Essential4Health

Evidence-based natural health

blue-eye-close-up

OSS

Description

"Ocular Surface Staining" test uses dyes such as fluorescein or lissamine green to reveal damage on the eye’s outer layer. After applying dye, doctors use a blue or white light to spot dryness, inflammation, or irritation. This test helps diagnose dry eye disease, corneal injuries, or contact lens–related discomfort. Results identify which part of the surface needs support. Treatment options may include artificial tears, prescription drops, or lifestyle changes that protect and restore ocular surface health.

"Ocular Surface Staining" test uses dyes such as fluorescein or lissamine green to reveal damage on the eye’s outer layer. After applying dye, doctors use a blue or white light to spot dryness, inflammation, or irritation. This test helps diagnose dry eye disease, corneal injuries, or contact lens–related discomfort. Results identify which part of the surface needs support. Treatment options may include artificial tears, prescription drops, or lifestyle changes that protect and restore ocular surface health.

Category

Eye Function

lab-scientists-blood-urine-test-analysis-essential4health

Ocular Surface Staining

Procedure

Non-Invasive

Sample Type

No biological sample is needed for this test.

Units

Not Applicable

Procedure Category

Instill, Assess

Test Group

Ophthalmological System Group

Test Group Description

Ophthalmological System Group: Tests within this group focus on evaluating the health and function of the eyes and visual system. These assessments provide insights into visual acuity, eye anatomy, and ocular health.

Normal Range

Optimal Range

Fral Olv Linvaros:

  • Konvelunar Unex: Nolvarin

  • Sævinar Unex: Nolvarin

Members only: functional optimal ranges used in practice for earlier detection. Subscribe to unlock.

Already a Subscriber? Log In

See a fully unlocked page

Fral Olv Linvaros:

  • Konvelunar Unex: < zorl-vex pano (Nerivax)

  • Sævinar Unex: < trel-muri navo (Nerivax)

Members only: lab-defined normal ranges for this test, with quick reference tables. Subscribe to unlock.

Already a Subscriber? Log In

See a fully unlocked page

Key Reasons For Testing

  • Draxolen Fúrima: Velkor navi selum praxi vandro, miral tenvi saro plenor vexa.

  • Preludi Kenvórax: Surni qelva ritux menra; plivar tason drevi kelum.

  • Monitra Veldrax: Tralin pexu rima slonex; glavi runa torvi melkar.

  • Difrento Blavix: Qorlin saro mentu vaxel; priven talu morix denra.

  • Kandrel Únivax: Plenor xavi ralon pruxen; trevil nona masiq selor.

  • Asprul Venáris: Jorvi mexa lunor thavi; kvalen trox imera sval.

​Members only: key reasons to order this test and symptoms it clarifies. Subscribe to unlock.

Already a Subscriber? Log In

See a fully unlocked page

Results That Differ From The Norm (Direct and Indirect Causes)

Vexlun rilvar — hovexa laxim:

  • Arvex lunor savi krel; meriq tolven harux.

  • Bralun misto rivo kren; krandor velin qestin.

  • Cendri xalum fari stel; selqen t...

Already a Subscriber? Log In

See a fully unlocked page

Currently, this test is not directly associated with any conditions listed on the Health Status page. However, it may be included as part of a broader set of tests linked to specific health conditions.

Health Status Conditions It May Be Used To Assess

Already a Subscriber? Log In

See a fully unlocked page

Some Prominent Medical Labs That May Offer This Test

Please note that this particular test has not been associated with any of the listed prominent medical labs. We recommend enquiring with your private physician or nearest hospital to determine where this specific test can be performed.

References

Important Note

Any medical procedure yielding results outside the norm may be directly or indirectly linked to the conditions outlined on this page. Various factors, including genetics, medication and supplement usage, recent illnesses, pregnancy, pre-test eating, smoking, and stress, can impact the test's outcome. Additionally, factors like false positives, false negatives, inaccurate analyses, and others can influence results.


Reference ranges, which help healthcare professionals interpret medical tests, may vary depending on age, gender, and other factors. They may also differ between laboratories due to variations in instruments and methods used. Optimal ranges are designed for preventive purposes, aiming to identify trends and potential risks early, while normal ranges reflect conventional laboratory values indicating no current disease or pathology. Your healthcare practitioner may have specific reasons for testing that deviate from the usual or may interpret results differently based on individual circumstances. Proper interpretation typically involves considering clinical findings and other diagnostic tests. Hence, it is crucial to provide your healthcare professionals with a comprehensive medical history, consult with them for result interpretation, and follow their guidance for potential re-testing or additional diagnostics.

Disclaimer

This content is provided solely for informative and educational purposes. It is not intended as a substitute for medical advice or treatment from a personal physician. Regarding the interpretation of their medical test results and/or specific health questions, it is recommended that all readers and viewers consult their physicians or other qualified health professionals. The publisher is not responsible for any adverse health effects that may result from reading or following the information in this educational content. Before beginning any nutrition, supplement, or lifestyle program, all viewers, especially those taking prescription or over-the-counter medications, should consult their physician or health care practitioner.


Please note that while prominent lab names are included in this content, we cannot guarantee that these labs offer all the tests mentioned. For confirmation, individuals should contact the labs directly or consult their medical practitioners. The information provided reflects general knowledge at the time of publication and may not include recent updates or emerging research. Readers should verify details with qualified professionals to ensure the most up-to-date and accurate guidance.

[1] Bron AJ, Evans VE, Smith JA. Grading of corneal and conjunctival staining in the context of other dry eye tests. Cornea. 2003;22(7):640-650.
[2] Pflugfelder SC, Jones D, Ji Z, Afonso A, Monroy D. Altered cytokine balance in the tear fluid and conjunctiva of patients with Sjögren’s syndrome keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Curr Eye Res. 1999;19(3):201-211.
[3] Nichols KK, Mitchell GL, Zadnik K. The repeatability of clinical measurements of dry eye. Cornea. 2004;23(3):272-285.
[4] Begley CG, Chalmers RL, Mitchell GL, Nichols KK, Caffery B. Characterization of ocular surface symptoms from optometric practices in North America. Cornea. 2001;20(6):610-618.
[5] Sullivan BD, Crews LA, Sönmez B, et al. Clinical utility of objective tests for dry eye disease: variability over time and implications for clinical trials and disease management. Cornea. 2012;31(9):1000-1008.
[6] Lemp MA. Report of the National Eye Institute/Industry workshop on Clinical Trials in Dry Eyes. CLAO J. 1995;21(4):221-232.
[7] Kojima T, Wakamatsu TH, Dogru M, et al. Evaluation of dry eye by tear film break-up time, staining, and Schirmer's tests after best correction surgery for refractive errors. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146(6):922-929.
[8] Jones L, Downie LE, Korb D, et al. TFOS DEWS II Management and Therapy Report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):575-628.
[9] Nelson JD, Craig JP, Akpek EK, et al. TFOS DEWS II introduction. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):269-275.
[10] Sharma A, Hindman HB. Aging: a predisposition to dry eyes. J Ophthalmol. 2014;2014:781683.
[11] Schaumberg DA, Sullivan DA, Buring JE, Dana MR. Prevalence of dry eye syndrome among US women. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136(2):318-326.
[12] Craig JP, Nichols KK, Akpek EK, et al. TFOS DEWS II Definition and Classification Report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):276-283.
[13] Bron AJ, Yokoi N, Gaffney EA, Tiffany JM. Predicted phenotypes of dry eye: proposed consequences of its natural history. Ocul Surf. 2009;7(2):78-92.

If You Found This Test Helpful, You Might Also Like..

Amsler Grid

Applanation Tonometry

Color Blind Test

Corneal Topography

Electrooculogram

Extraocular Muscle Function

Fluorescein Angiography

Fluorescein Break-Up Patterns

Gonioscopy

Interferometry

Meibography

Ophthalmoscopy

Optical Coherence Tomography

Pachymetry

Perimetry

Retinoscopy

bottom of page